Health and Safety In a workplace Free Essays

I have chosen two work places to compare in my health and safety investigation. First one is in my school, and my second workplace is in St James medical centre. I wrote up a questionnaire about health and safety to give to both of my workplaces. We will write a custom essay sample on Health and Safety In a workplace or any similar topic only for you Order Now An employee in this place will fill out the questionnaire to see how much they know about their work place. Firstly both my workplaces do know the evacuation procedures in the event of an emergency or a fire. Waste Materials: Each workplace uses different methods of disposing of their waste materials. The workplace has special bins for unsafe waste and the school uses the sinks or black bags because it is usually not harmful waste thrown away if it is then it is disposed appropriately for the type of martial of substance. The workplace recycles all unwanted paper the same as the school has just bought in paper bins to use in each classroom. Is the electricity is used safely: In each workplace there is different electricity safety insurgency firstly in the Post-graduates who have just finished university can also use electronic information for a variety of things as well. Firstly keep in touch with all there friends that they made from university on websites such as Facebook, MySpace and others like that as well as the chat programs e.g. MSN and others. Secondly using it to find jobs and to start to look for cars and houses school the students can use the switches and the equipment under supervision the teacher has control of the safety switches and the circuit breakers in each lab. The workplace has a rule that only qualified elections are allowed to touch the equipment. Prevent fire: Each workplace is smoke free to insure no fires caused by that. The school has gas cut of switches if the fire was caused by gas to stop the building blowing up. No naked flames and put on near chemicals that are flammable. Each workplace has fire alarms. The medical centre insures that all equipment is switched off before leaving building at night. Effects on environment: The medical centre knows the effect in the environment is helping people. In the school Some ways of having to use the electronic information can be: having to buy clothes online delivered to your door, buying plane tickets for anywhere around the world, having your shopping delivered to your door by a local super market e.g. Tesco, Sainsbury and ASDA. there is know effects to the environment because there are such few hazards chemicals and if there was then they would be so few medical centres w that it wouldn’t make any differences. Hazard chemicals: Each work place does use chemicals the medical centre has correct training for individuals that are handling them and also monitoring of using them too. The school has fume cupboards are used in the labs ands correct storage. Each chemical is clearly labelled how bad it is also they have fire proof cabinets. None of my work places use any biological hazards. First aid: In the medical centre there are doctors and qualified nurses in the case of emergency first aid. In the school there is about 7 teachers qualified in first aid, How to cite Health and Safety In a workplace, Papers

Graphic Rating Scale Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Graphic Rating Scale. Answer: Graphic Rating Scale A graphic rating scale is a performance evaluation method where vital traits and behaviors of any employee are listed. The list developed helps employers quantify the performance of their employees by rating each staff member against the given traits.(mbaskool, 2017) The rating scale can use traits like ethics, communication skills, ability to resolve conflicts, reliability and leadership skills.(Ingram, 2018) Rating is usually done a scale of one to five. The scale includes Non-Existence-This refers to a careless worker with repeated mistakes. Average-The work is sometimes unsatisfactory. Good-The work done acceptably with minimal errors. The very Good-The employee is reliable, with good quality work. Excellent-The work done is of high quality with very minimal errors. A good rating scale should: Clearly define the traits. It should be behaviorally constructed. Ambiguous traits of honesty and loyalty should be avoided. The traits should be relevant to the behavior in question. Advantages The method is user-friendly and easy to comprehend. It provides standardized comparison criteria for evaluation. The behaviors can be quantified making the appraisal exercise easier. Disadvantages The method does not understand employee strengths effectively. The people in question have diverse characteristics, yet these quantify to a similar score. Perception errors cause incorrect rating. For example, stereotyping and halo effect. The judges have a different perception of behaviors which could lead to errors in judgment. Rating is difficult because it is tricky to rate behaviors to either excellent or good because the scale does not clarify the ideal behaviors. It is hard to identify average employees. A Retail Sales Associate These employees offer services like helping out a customer to find hard to place products or items, persuade a person to buy whatever they are selling. They also process the transaction using cash registers and keep track of all the money in the retail outlets. They work everywhere including grocery stores, at car showrooms and even department stores. Retail sales associates need to be polite, friendly and outgoing because they will meet difficult people to convince to buy. They should have full knowledge of the products they are selling. (Torres, 2018) Examples of traits used in the Graphic Rating Scale. The ability to multitask - This is where the associate can do many activities at a given time simultaneously. The ability to solve problems -This is where the associate can help provide solutions to a given problem. One should also have perfect knowledge of the company policies. Adaptability -This is the ability to be a quick learner and take on challenges and learn from them. Teamwork- One should be able to collaborate with others and have a positive contribution to a team. Positive attitude -One can show this with a smile, a handshake or staring directly into someone`s eyes. Respect for management - Doesnt it make it hard for the leaders and co-workers to work with you? Self-motivation - Have a goal to achieve. This will help one have a sense of direction, and one can even become innovative and use the ideas to improve their performance. A Food Restaurant Manager A fast food manager has the responsibility of all operations of a fast food restaurant. He can hire assistants to help him or her to supervise in case of his absence. These managers perform duties that include: Organizes equipment in the restaurant, stock, re-orders supplies, ensures cleanliness as well as security. Prepares budgets and works towards maximizing profits that are set in place by the head office. Administers payrolls and takes controls in the restaurant. Recruits new members of staff, and then train them. He can also already develop the already existing staff by training them. He schedules all staff operations and tasks. He also motivates as well as encourages the staff to achieve the already set goals. His job is also to handle customer questions and complaints. He also helps implement campaign organized by the head office. These include point of sale promotions. He appraises employee performance and documents any restaurant related reports or information. He attends regular meetings set by the head office and also reports to the management. Characteristics of a fast food restaurant manager He or she should possess the following traits that are used to evaluate their profession. They should be problem-solvers and great decision makers. They should be self-motivated. They should be ambitious. They should possess business awareness. They should have good leadership skills, motivate other team members and be influential. Skills to service customers should be excellent. They should be fast learners. Adequate organizational skills are also a required trait. They should have goals that drive them to achieve best results in their work.(Graduate Prospects, 2016) Examples of traits that can be used in the Graphic Rating scale(Hcareers, 2013) Stress management. This is the ability to deal with conflicts and stress resulting from a lot of workloads. Multi-tasking. This could involve picking calls, managing staff and interacting with customers. This is a determination to achieve success in whatever task is done. Record-keeping. This is keeping proper documentation of stock and information relating to employees. This introduction of new ideas and operating with the new ideas for overall performance. This involves safety in the distribution of foodstuffs. Social skills. This is the ability to have good interpersonal skills with customers. Product knowledge. Managers should be aware of what is sold to the customers. They should even taste the food. Systemized thinking. Any ideas that are raised in the restaurant should be put into writing. Evaluate if the idea will lead to losses or profits before implementation of the same. Profitable thinking. This involves asking you if any key decision made will lead to any profits in the restaurant. References Graduate Prospects. (2016, December). PROSPECTS. Retrieved from https://www.prospectus.ac.uk/job-profile/fast-food-restraurant-manager Hcareers. (2013, April 15). Hcareers where Hospitality works. Retrieved from https://www.hcareers.com/article/career-advice/10-top-characteristics-of-successful-restraurant-managers-in-the-us-2013 Ingram, D. (2018). online at business. Retrieved from www.smallbusiness.chron.com/employee-behavior-characteristic-performance-appraisals-11816.html mbaskool. (2017). mbaskool. Retrieved from https://www.mbaskool.com/business-concepts/human-resources-hr-terms/15338-graphic-rating-scale.html Torres, L. (2018). Monster Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/9-qualities-that-make-you-hirable-to-a-retail-manager

UFOs (741 words) Essay Example For Students

UFOs (741 words) Essay UFOs Introduction:What exactly is a U.F.O? Where do they come from? What do they wantfrom us? Well, a UFO is an unusual airborne object that cannot beidentified, even after an expert examination. 90 Percent of these reportsare either Hoaxes, Conventional objects, or some poor person going insane. The other 10 percent is considered UFO enigma. History:The data of the first UFO sighting is not known. Some researchers saythat UFO sightings date back to ancient times. There is no evidence forthis speculation, so it is just a thought. Most researchers though markthe beginning of sightings in the United States un the later 1800s, theywere called The Mystery Airships. The next major fleet of sightings wereduring the second world war, from pilots who say they say metal likeobjects floating in the sky. These fighter pilots called them foofighters. And in 1947 in Europe, there were sightings of silent ghostrockets. None of these speculations were ever entirely explained. The UFO phenomenon entered the publics eye on June 24, 1947, at2:44am, when private pilot Kenneth Arnold reported sighting nine circularobjects in the skies over the state of Washington. He (Kenneth) describedthese objects like saucers skipping over water. There the term FlyingSaucer was born. UFO Waves:Since 1947 there have been UFO sightings in almost every country. Sometimes there is something called a UFO wave, which for a short time UFOsighting increase rapidly in one certain area. For instance, UFO wavesoccurred in France and Italy in 1954, in New Guinea in 1958, and in theUSSR in 1967. In the United States and Canada, waves happened in 1947,1952, 1957, 1965-67, and in 1979. Nobody can explain ANYTHING about thesewaves. Attempts to link them with hysteria, mentality and stress have allfailed. Facts and Polls:There are thousands of sightings each year. In 1973, a Gallup pollsaid that 11 percent of the American public has had an encounter with aUFO. More then 500,000 worldwide sighting reports have been computerized. A study of these reports are random and show no pattern. Witnesses cutacross economic, class, race and educational lines. However, a greaterpercentage of these reports have come from people living in rural areas,then from people living in urban areas. The reason for this. UNKNOWN! Sightings:Witnesses report many, many different shapes and sizes of UFOs, evenshape changing ones. The famous Two bowls joined at the rim shape isreported often, but reports of objects shaped like cigars, squares, balls,triangles, rings, and GUITARS are also common. Most of these reports are of objects from far away, but reports ofclose encounters also exist. Some of the most interesting sightings, arereported on or near the ground. Often the person claims that the ship lefta mark or something on the ground, this is called a Trace Case. Sometimes these cases are said to make mechanical or electrical things togo haywire. For instance, a car stalling, a computer going haywire, a T.V. blowing up, ECT. Claims of witnessing a UFO have come from sober, reliable people. These reports, however, have to be separated from the contactees, whoclaim they have been a part of the Alien Brotherhood, who gave them UFOrides to other times and planets. Government Projects:The U.S. Air Force attempted to study UFOs from 1948-69 with the BlueBook Project. After collecting reports for 21 years, it concluded the UFOsdid not represent a threat to the United States (at war that is). But, in1953 the U.S. thought that the USSR might be using the UFOs as a warfareweapon against them. So, from 53-69 that is all the United States werethinking about, and never considered any of this to be a unique phenomenon. .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .postImageUrl , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:hover , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:visited , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:active { border:0!important; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:active , .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ubf8c29fbb71468541716904fc36a971c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Fur Trade Period in the Indian Territory Essay Conclusion:I have learned a great amount of things from doing this project. There are many people out there studying these sightings, and reports. People using their own funds to figure out what exactly is up there. Ifeel bad for these people, for in my mind, I think all of the UFO stuff isjust abnormal weather conditions. Now, the close encounters on the ground,I cant explain that, could be hysteria, or booze. Or maybe, just maybe,there is something out there, just waiting to be found. I still thinkbecause of the lack of information, UFO sightings are the most mysteriousin the world, OR BEYOND!

The Roswell Incident I. Introduction A. Zeus B. American Indians C. Eg

The Roswell Incident I. Introduction A. Zeus B. American Indians C. Egyptians II. Background A. Time of the crash B. Witnesses 1. Mac Brazel 2. Sheriff George Wilcox 3. Roswell's 509th Bomb Squad 4. Initial recovery team III. Individual Testimonies A. Unnamed witness of Roswell recovery team B. Curry Holden C. Glenn Dennis D. Dan Dwyer IV. The Alien Autopsy Films A. Eighteen minute film at the autopsy center in Fort Worth B. Three minute film at Roswell site C. Researcher's opinions V. Conclusion The Roswell Incident The people of the world have always had a mysterious belief that Earth wasn't the only planet in the universe that supported life. This belief dates back to ancient times when heavenly and demonic stories were told of gods who strode across the skies on their golden chariots. Tales as far fetched as Zeus who threw lightening bolts from his fingertips to stories as credible as the American Indian's Cachinas, who supposedly taught them to farm an d saved them from numerous disasters. The Egyptians, who built their mammoth pyramids with only the use of man power, used hieroglyphics. These same hieroglyphics have been unofficially documented as being similar to symbols found on unidentified aircraft wreckage found in several incidences over the past fifty years (Montgomery 225-32, 236-37). Are these stories all mere coincidence? Some researchers think not and have continued to unveil new evidence that is believably true. Recently, new facts have been brought up on the most documented UFO (unidentified flying object) sighting of all time: the Roswell Incident. The Roswell Incident is a UFO crash that occurred at 11:30 p.m. on July 4th, 1947 in Roswell, New Mexico (Randal 10). Mac Brazel, a local New Mexico rancher, discovered a considerable amount of unusual debris while riding out on horseback early in the morning to check his sheep after a night of intense thunderstorms. He reported to Sheriff George Wilcox after driving into Roswell, that the aircraft had created a shallow gouge several hundred feet long and was scattered over a large area. Sheriff Wilcox then notified authorities at the Roswell Army Air Field and with the assistance of his deputies, proceeded to investigate the matter. Shortly after the 509th Bomb Group arrived from their station 35 miles away (Walker 38), they closed off the area for a number of days and retrieved the wreckage. The debris was initially taken to Roswell Army Air Field and eventually flown to Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio (Jeffrey). Before the military could intervene, the event had already been witnessed by more than one-hundred people. Local police, fire squad, and curious members of the Roswell community make up these people. A lot of them were part of the initial recovery team and are now telling their stories that have been bottled up for nearly a half of a century (Randal 11). According to one unnamed witness of the Roswell recovery team, The crash site was litter ed with pieces of the aircraft. Something about the size of a fighter plane had crashed, the metal was unlike anything I'd ever seen before. I picked up a piece the size of a car fender with one hand, it couldn't have weighed more than a quarter of a pound and no matter how hard I tried I couldn't even get it to bend (Randal 11). This statement describes the type of material that was found at the site and has been described in this manner by numerous witnesses. The next statement was made by Curry Holden, an archeologist who was one of the first to arrive on the scene, "I saw a crashed airplane without wings and with a fat fuselage. There were three bodies. Two were outside the craft and the other one was still inside, visible through a gash in the fuselage" (Walker 38). Other bits of information have also been documented from locals arriving initially at the scene. First, there is the local undertaker, Glenn Dennis, who was asked by the base if he could provide child-sized coffins. Then there was the local fireman, Dan Dwyer, whose crew was called out to the crash site and who collected some of the mysterious metal debris. He told his family

Critique on Plato’s Apology of Socrates Essay Essays

Critique on Plato’s Apology of Socrates Essay Essays Critique on Plato’s Apology of Socrates Essay Paper Critique on Plato’s Apology of Socrates Essay Paper Socrates was a great philosopher of his clip. There came a point in his life when his beliefs were questioned and his instructions doubted. He was charged for evil workss and incorrect behaviors. His accusers said he made people see the worse as better and passed them on as truths. They besides said that he corrupted the young person and that he did non believe in the Gods recognized by the province. Socrates addressed the Athenians in defence of his philosophical life. He appealed to the Men of Athens to hear him out and exert cautiousness in judging him because he had all the replies for them. He said he was a wise adult male and his wisdom came from the prophet. He believed in Gods contrary to what they accused him of. He taught the young person of virtuousnesss and denied he corrupted them. He neer feared decease every bit much as he feared the unjust†¦ The Athenians wanted to cognize how Socrates became a celebrated wise adult male and where he got his wisdom from. A philosopher like Socrates engaged people in treatments. He gave learned sentiments and replies to the most enigmatic and hard inquiries that frequently confronted ordinary heads. When these people were convinced and enlightened they went off with nil but congratulationss and esteem for Socrates. grounds why they called Socrates. a wise adult male. Many people came to him to larn more. It can non be said that wisdom is something one is born with. In the instance of Socrates his wisdom came from the prophet. He had godly counsel in his instructions. One with a godly counsel taught non merely what was good and what was right but besides lived by those dogmas. The prophet was besides what kept Socrates from haughtiness. Socrates knew he was wise because he knew that the wisdom he possessed meant small or was nil compared to God’s infinite wisdom. A philosopher may be wiser than any adult male. but is neer wisest. as lone God is. Socrates was asked why he did non portion his wisdom with the province and gave it sound advice. The prophet was the interior voice or the scruples of Socrates. When he was a kid the prophet prevented him from making what he intended to make. The prophet neer ordered him to make anything which was why he neer entertained the ideas of going a politician. He will neer be any good to the province by going one. Good and righteous work forces in political relations did non populate long to make more good. Towards the terminal of the test. when Socrates was sentenced to decease. Socrates mentioned the prophet once more. The prophet did non oppose what he said or stopped him from go forthing the house which was unusual if something bad was to go on. In the terminal. Socrates was happy to decease because the prophet had meant it for him. A philosopher was sought after for wise advocate and Socrates who sought the advocate of the prophet. The prophet symbolized the Divine Guidance which was the beginning of wisdom of Socrates. It strengthened his defence because it proved that his wisdom came from the Godhead and non from immorality. Socrates tested to convert the Athenians that he believed in Gods. At the start of the test began with a mention to God under whose name he said he will do his defence. God symbolized the highest authorization that Socrates subjected himself to. He respected a merely and righteous authorization. Socrates warned the Athenians that should they harm him. they will transgress against God. God had a intent for him in the Athenian personal businesss of the province. He was to agitate the province up whenever it was in daze. If they killed him after the test the province will everlastingly be in stupor as there will be no 1 to agitate it up. He was non one to travel against the province over any affair because God meant him to assist maintain order and non chaos. He must to talk up whenever that province was in disregard of its responsibilities. He knew what his duties were to the province and knew that he must maintain them. for God. God was the authorization over and above the province. Socrates gave the province its due topographic point. an authorization under God and originated from God. God was acknowledged by everyone as merely and righteous. To believe in God meant that Socrates conformed to the ways of God and it followed that he was merely and righteous besides. The impact of this in his defence was that Socrates. foremost of all was non an atheist as alleged by his accusers. Second. he was respectful of authorization. God and the province. Third. he was a good adult male who kept the ways of God. God as the Supreme Being is the symbol of the highest. merely and righteous authorization. Socrates was given the opportunity to travel free on the status that he stopped learning and talking to people. He refused outright because he would be negligent of his authorization from the prophet to travel and learn Virtues to work forces. Virtues symbolized cognition. It is a virtuousness to cognize right and incorrect and to do enlightened picks of right over incorrect. He had promised God that he will go on to learn for every bit long as he was able. He taught the people to set more value on the enrichment of the psyche. the chase of truth and wisdom alternatively of deriving material wealth. celebrity and glorification. A individual with virtuousness knows his existent worth. he neer underestimates neither does he overrates himself. He reminded them that their psyches must take precedency over their individuals and their ownerships. He taught virtuousnesss to anyone who came to him. immature or old. bad or good. rich or hapless. As a instructor he counseled them to take good and righteous lives. He was like a caring parent or brother. Those among the immature who had heard him talk became reasonable grownups. The charges against him were incorrectly. He neer corrupted the young person with the sort of learning he did. There was nil greater for him than to obey the bid of God to learn the people about virtuousnesss. The cognition that a philosopher portions with his pupils is a good defence for the philosophical life. while confuting that he was a corruptor of the young person. Virtues or cognition that he shared should convert the Athenians that Socrates was a virtuous adult male who sought the enlightenment of others. Teaching others so that they may non be nescient and so that they may take virtuous lives can non be said as evil workss. Taking others to the way of righteousness can non be called corruptness. Socrates should be vindicated of the charges against him as they were groundless and strictly prevarications. Socrates was neer sorry for the sort of life he lived even if it finally led him to his decease. Death was symbolic of the good for Socrates. Death to salvage a friend. decease in defence of a right. decease for one’s moral strong beliefs was all good deceases. A individual who feared decease lacked wisdom. because he feared the unknown. Socrates feared perpetrating unfairness and incorrectly more than he feared decease. When he was a senator. the generals were on test for go forthing the organic structures of the slain in a conflict. They were all tried at the same clip. which he opposed because it was illegal. He was the lone 1 in resistance. In malice of the menaces of impeachment and apprehension he stood his land. He took the hazard for jurisprudence and justness. Those were in the yearss of democracy. His resoluteness neer wavered even during the oligarchy. When Leon from Salamis was to be executed he with four others was ordered to convey the Salaminian to the rotunda. He refused and alternatively went place. He faced possible decease without fright. What he feared most so was to side with unfairness. When threatened with decease or temptation of being saved from decease even if it meant making incorrect. he would instead decease a thousand times. For Socrates decease is good. He philosophized that it was a province of deep slumber or one of blankness. Either manner it is a reposeful province. It is a province that we neer experience in most of our darks. He likened it to a journey which all of us will take at some point in our lives. In decease we will one time once more see those friends and heroes who have gone before us. There will besides be those victims of destiny worst than his with whom he will be able to compare notes with. In the test of Socrates. decease was associated with good. Socrates was neer afraid to decease for he was certain something good was bound to go on to him. That should stifle the desire of his accusers to inquire decease for Socrates. Why wish the best for person whom you wanted punished for misbehaviors. The prophet symbolized godly counsel. It proved hard for Socrates to claim that his wisdom came from the prophet from the God of Delphi. His lone believable informant was a dead adult male. A brother of the dead adult male was present in tribunal but he did non volunteer as informant. Socrates did non name him as informant to confirm his narrative. The prophet called him wise. His wisdom was come-at-able for the ordinary adult male. He did non claim that he had extraordinary wisdom for that would non be true. The instruction of Socrates was about righteousness. justness and humbleness. These are plants of goodness that logically will arise merely from the Godhead. God is a symbol of authorization. What God commanded Socrates to make he followed. Between the God and province. Socrates placed God foremost. A philosopher has regard for authorization and that should convert the Athenians that Socrates was a good adult male. He would really likely base on balls on this virtuousness to others. Virtue is a symbol of cognition. Socrates shared his doctrines with others so that they may be enlightened. He taught merely the good as his wisdom was from the Godhead beginning. In his test he made the Athenians know that his accusers know nil of what they were impeaching him of. As they were non-believers. with whom he had non shared his wisdom. his accusers remained nescient. Death is the symbol of something good and pleasant. something one should non fear merely like Socrates. The Work force of Athens will see Socrates as a adult male of bravery who was non scared of decease and an enlightened adherent of the Godhead who treated decease as a journey. a deep sleep or a crossing over. In the test of Socrates we found a adult male with a strong religion in God. despite accusals of godlessness. He chose right over incorrect all the clip even at the menace of decease and injury. He lived what he preached carried a meaningful and purposeful life. He wanted to convert the Athenians that learning the right values and lauding the virtuousnesss in people was no corruptness. An evil actor would make no such thing. No sum of force per unit area or menace or temptation would compromise his values. He kept God’s bid to him to go on learning at all cost to him. This came from a true truster of God and non from an atheist as Meletus had accused him to be. A philosopher would learn merely things that would be of value to people every bit good as those things that will make the individual tremendous good. A philosopher’s step of value puts the religious over and above the physical and the stuff. That is what separates the ordinary adult male from the philosopher. The wants of the ordinary adult male is of this universe and the philosopher’s is of the higher kingdom. There were many lessons learned from the statements of Socrates in his defence. They let us into the head of a philosopher with its deepness. wit. fluency. play and humor. It is hard to understand a philosopher because he is in a degree all by himself. His logic is simple and clear at the start but he can be confusing towards the terminal. It is diverting how they turn one’s statement against his ain like what he did to Meletus. Socrates’ statements are excessively profound for the ordinary head to follow. A philosopher’s life is excessively dull to wish for oneself and excessively unsympathetic to want. He goes for the simple and unsophisticated. He is non attached to the stuff. He can work with no wage and treasures the fulfilment in making the occupation for God and fellowmen. It is adequate wage for a philosopher that others learn of truth and wisdom from him. Socrates helped us understand the life of a adult male for others. as a philosopher really is. Socrates was a adult male with a strong religion in God. He placed God above all else. God represented the authorization in his life. He would make anything God commanded him to make. out of great regard. A philosopher who regards God in such high regard is worthy of trust. He could feign to cognize so much because people hold his every word as truth. Socrates was non that sort of philosopher. He could presume power like a God but Socrates did non. He thought of himself as wise because he accepted that his wisdom and power were non the ultimate. Philosophers have all the replies. Their cognition is deep and expansive. They can speak about anything and everything. They spoke with authorization. They have the gift of cognition. They derive their wisdom from the Supreme Being who is all-knowing. As such they speak merely of the merely and the righteous. They portion the cognition with the people who go to them for their good advocate. They lead simple lives without the unneeded furnishings. They care for their psyche more than their physical and material concerns. The portion with their fellow work forces what they valuable ownership. cognition. Socrates was all the above. The Philosophers were brave work forces who fear incorrectly more than they fear decease. There was no manner they would be swayed from their strong beliefs because of the menace of penalty. Neither will they halt from making what is right to be saved from injury. They will decease for a friend. be hanged for a good cause and crush for their beliefs. The Philosophers were no ordinary persons. They endured because of their religion. their doggedness and wisdom. They may hold been misunderstood but they have been understood more. Their bequests live on. long after they are gone. â€Å"Socrates’ Defense. † 1994-2000. Apology by Plato. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. 10 May 2008 hypertext transfer protocol: //classics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. edu/Plato/apology. hypertext markup language.

Space Cowboys Film and Genre Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Space Cowboys Film and Genre - Essay Example This film has been penned by Ken Kaufman and Howard Klausner of which Clint Eastwood has given superb direction. This is a pretty entertaining and one of the more rambunctious films that have been directed by Eastwood whereby they have clearly explored the idea with vitality and a sense of dynamism. The movie has put a very unique kind of spin on the formula that the longer one lives; the lesser is his worth with the passage of time. The story is set from the scene of 1958 in which pilots Frank Corvin played by Clint Eastwood himself and Hawk Hawkins, by Tommy Lee Jones are members of Team Daedalus, which is an elite Air Force group that is bent upon testing the high-altitude planes as well as dreaming of becoming the first American astronauts to do so. It is unfortunate to mention here that when this very dream does not see the light of the day, Frank starts blaming Bob Gerson, played by James Cromwell who is his commander for betraying him in the middle of the accomplishment of the dream mentioned above. After duration of four decades now, this same individual has become a NASA big shot who has got a huge problem up his sleeves. A huge Soviet satellite, which is named Ikon, has become dysfunctional and is threatening to fall out of orbit and then crash into the region of the earth. Indeed, it is true that similar in notion to the confusion surrounding the US space agency and its affiliates, this guidance system for the satellite is in more ways than one quite similar to that with one of Skylab that was initially put in place by Frank Corvin.

Public Administration and Civil Service Reform UNDP Cambodia. Case Essay

Public Administration and Civil Service Reform UNDP Cambodia. Case Study - Essay Example Most public managers profess to an attraction to good managerial performance as well as good government performance. However, if their actual conduct is examined, it will become clear that there are two opposing and distinct perspectives on public reform administration reform. Crusading and free-spirited managers are always searching for better methods, promising designs, new ideas, and innovations. They embrace, and believe in novelty. They assess what others are doing elsewhere and identify what they can adapt or copy, and are ready to take risks just to improve performance. They are so eager for change that they often fall victim to the gimmicks and fads that are often witnessed in public management without reason or rhyme. On the other hand, reactionary managers exhibit too much caution and rarely show willingness to attempt anything new. This paper will discuss the factors that hinder or facilitate public administration reform by comparing two programmes of public service reform and looking at the lessons learned from those programmes in terms of the obstacles and opportunities involved in public administration reform. Key words Public administration reform, public management, public service.... to as the National Program for Administrative Reform (NPAR), which would be the foundation upon which the whole public administration reform program would be built. UNDP Cambodia decided to directly support the NPAR, and offered help to the Council of Administrative Reform (CAR) which was aimed at: a) Strengthening the capability of the council’s secretariat in order to improve the effectiveness of national consensus building, strategic planning, donor co-ordination, policy development, and how the NPAR is managed strategically. b) Facilitating the enforcement of priority reform programs and sub-programs, and also the creation of implementation plans. c) Supporting the creation and organization of a Priority Mission Group (PMG) plan so as to improve the efficiency in public service delivery in vital areas of government administration, and also to accelerate reforms. UNDP’s assistance in public administrative reform targets not only decentralized reform enforcement, but also wholesome strategic reform organization. It identified the need to integrate both aspects more fluidly, and also learned some important lessons in the process of supporting Cambodia in its quest to improve public service. Overall, although this project was originally meant to reflect UNDP’s expertise in public administrative reforms, other donors were unwilling to cooperate (Heeks 2002, pg. 25). In addition to this, poor coordination in comparison with other reform areas resulted in weak connections to other activities, disorganized activities, and a loss of focus. Lessons Learned Strategic constituency development is vital to acquire support for and run complex systems modification processes The public administration reform program’s original design failed to recognize the CAR as the